Both the C172 and C182 have become renowned as popular piston aircraft. With over 44,000 C172s and 23,000 C182s produced to date, these models have established a solid reputation due to their high-wing, four-seat configuration, and reliable construction.
Key Distinctions
Though manufactured by the same company and bearing a striking resemblance, several notable differences set the C182 Skylane and C172 Skyhawk apart:
- Price: The C182 is more expensive, while the C172 offers a lower price point;
- Size: The C182 is larger, but the interior dimensions are not significantly different from the C172.
Detailed Comparison: Cessna 182 Skylane
Exterior Dimensions:
- Length: 29 ft (8.8 m);
- Height: 9 ft 4 in (2.8 m);
- Wingspan: 36 ft (10.97 m);
- Wing Area: 174 sq ft (16.17 sq m).
Interior Information:
- Length: 11 ft 2 in (3.4 m);
- Height: 49 in (1.2 m);
- Width: 42 in (1.07 m);
- Maximum Occupants: 4.
Baggage Capacity:
- Compartment Volume: 32 cu.ft (0.91 cu.m);
- Baggage Weight: 200 lb (91 kg).
Weights:
- Maximum Ramp Weight: 3,110 lb (1,411 kg);
- Maximum Takeoff Weight: 3,100 lb (1,406 kg);
- Maximum Landing Weight: 2,950 lb (1,338 kg);
- Useable Fuel Weight: 522 lb (237 kg).
Performance:
- Maximum Cruise Speed: 145 ktas (269 km/h);
- Maximum Range: 915 nm (1,695 km);
- Fuel Burn @ 75%: 13 gph (32.5 lph);
- Takeoff Distance: 1,514 ft (461 m);
- Landing Distance: 1,350 ft (411 m);
- Service Ceiling: 18,100 ft (5,517 m);
- Maximum Climb Rate: 924 fpm (282 mpm);
- Maximum Limit Speed: 175 kias (324 km/h).
Detailed Comparison: Cessna 172 Skyhawk
Exterior Dimensions:
- Length: 27 ft 2 in (8.3 m);
- Height: 8 ft 11 in (2.7 m);
- Wingspan: 36 ft 1 in (11.00 m);
- Wing Area: 174 sq ft (16.17 sq m).
Interior Information:
- Length: 11 ft 10 in (3.6 m);
- Height: 48 in (1.2 m);
- Width: 40 in (1.00 m);
- Maximum Occupants: 4.
Baggage Capacity:
- Compartment Volume: 30 cu ft (0.85 cu.m);
- Baggage Weight: 120 lb (54 kg).
Weights:
- Maximum Ramp Weight: 2,558 lb (1,160 kg);
- Maximum Takeoff Weight: 2,550 lb (1,157 kg);
- Maximum Landing Weight: 2,550 lb (1,157 kg);
- Useable Fuel Weight: 318 lb (144 kg).
Performance:
- Maximum Cruise Speed: 145 ktas (269 km/h);
- Maximum Range: 640 nm (1,185 km);
- Fuel Burn @ 75%: 8.6 gph (32.6 lph);
- Takeoff Distance: 1,514 ft (461 m);
- Landing Distance: 1,350 ft (411 m);
- Service Ceiling: 14,000 ft (4,267 m);
- Maximum Climb Rate: 721 fpm (220 mpm);
- Maximum Limit Speed: 163 kias (302 km/h).
In-Depth Comparison
In this section, we will thoroughly compare various aspects of both aircraft models, enabling you to make an informed decision based on:
- Price: Analyzing the average price range for new and used C172s and C182s, along with their resale value;
- Size and Space: Examining the exterior and interior dimensions, as well as the baggage capacity of each model;
- Powerplant: Understanding the historical engine variations and their reliability;
- Performance: Evaluating the cruising speed, range, fuel burn, takeoff/landing distances, and other performance parameters.
Winner: Cessna 172
A standard factory-fresh C182S comes with a price tag of approximately $530,000, which includes advanced avionics and similar features. The market value for C182s has seen a significant surge in recent years, with older models commanding high prices. The C182R, for example, can fetch around $108,000, while the turbocharged C182T model can reach as high as $359,000.
Considering the similarities between the two aircraft, the price difference may be difficult to justify for some buyers, making the C172 the preferred choice in terms of affordability.
Winner: Cessna 172
Size and Space:
At first glance, the C172 and C182 may appear almost identical. However, upon closer inspection, the C182’s larger size becomes apparent. Despite this, the interior dimensions of the two models are quite similar. The C172’s cabin is actually eight inches longer, with only a slight difference in height and width compared to the C182. The baggage capacities are also closely matched, with the C172 offering only two cubic inches less than the C182.
Considering the marginal disparity in interior space and the substantial price difference, the C172 emerges as the winner in this category, offering better value for money.
Winner: Cessna 172
Powerplant:
The Continental O-300 engine in the C172 has proven reliable, provided regular inspections are conducted to prevent issues such as stuck valves and corrosion in the oil pans. The engine has a time between overhaul (TBO) of 1800 hours, with an overhaul cost of approximately $25,000.
The C182’s Lycoming O-540 engine offers increased power with its six-cylinder configuration. While both engines have their merits, the C182’s engine provides a notable advantage in terms of performance.
Winner: Cessna 182
Conclusion
In the comparison between the Cessna 172 Skyhawk and the Cessna 182 Skylane, several factors have been considered to determine their differences and suitability for different needs. Both aircraft models have a rich history and a solid reputation in the aviation community.
- The C172 Skyhawk stands out as the more affordable option, making it a popular choice for first-time aircraft owners and those looking for a cost-effective solution. It offers a comfortable cabin, respectable performance, and a reliable powerplant.
- On the other hand, the C182 Skylane boasts a larger size, increased payload capacity, and a more powerful six-cylinder engine. It offers enhanced performance and a higher level of versatility, making it an appealing choice for pilots seeking a step-up from smaller piston aircraft.
- Ultimately, the choice between the Cessna 172 and the Cessna 182 comes down to individual needs, preferences, and budget. For those who prioritize affordability and value for money, the C172 emerges as the winner. However, if additional space, payload capacity, and more power are crucial factors, the C182 proves to be a worthy investment.
Regardless of the chosen model, both the Cessna 172 and the Cessna 182 continue to uphold their reputation for reliability, performance, and overall excellence in the aviation industry.
